SIGNALGUARD / DIRECTORY

Company trust directory

Find a company. Explore its findings, evidence coverage and open questions.

{{ directoryStatus }}

{{ preview.announce }}

Select a company to preview its assessment

{{ preview.name }}

Fictional demo {{ preview.domain }} ↗

{{ preview.description }}
Trust assessment
Evidence coverage
{{ preview.coveragePct }}% {{ preview.coverageFraction }} checks

{{ preview.coveragePassLabel }} · {{ preview.coverageConcernLabel }} · {{ preview.coverageInfoLabel }} · {{ preview.coverageOpenLabel }}

Risk area scores

{{ a.name }}
Score: {{ a.score }}/100

{{ a.passLabel }} · {{ a.concernLabel }}
Fictional demo

{{ r.industry }}

{{ r.location }}
Trust score
{{ r.overall }}/100
{{ r.label }}
{{ c.name }}{{ c.score }}
{{ r.coverageLabel }}{{ r.summaryText }}

No companies match

Change the search, industry, or favourites filter.

{{ showingLabel }}

Scores are provisional summaries, not guarantees of safety. Missing evidence is not a demonstrated problem. Fictional demos are labelled and use synthetic findings.

Compare {{ trayCount }} {{ c.name }} Empty slot

{{ rep.name }}

Fictional demo{{ rep.domain }}

{{ rep.industry }} · {{ rep.observedDate }}

{{ rep.trustScore }}/100
{{ rep.assessmentStage }}

{{ rep.interpretation }}

{{ rep.overallReading }}

{{ rep.scoreOrigin }}Score details ↗
Historical finding composition. Current company status may differ; source ratings retain their own dates.

Fictional demonstration

Evidence coverage{{ rep.coveragePercent }}%

{{ rep.overall }} of {{ rep.applicable }} checks assessed

{{ rep.unresolved }} unresolved · {{ rep.notApplicable }} not applicable

{{ currentCategory.name }} questions

✓ Passed⚠ Concern? Unresolvedi Informational— Not applicable
{{ currentCategory.questionCountLabel }}

Flagged concerns {{ attentionCountLabel }}

Read the evidence before drawing conclusions

No concerns recorded in the assessed checks. Missing evidence remains unscored.

Company claims & verification {{ rep.claimTotal }} claims

{{ rep.noClaimsText }}
About this company
{{ v.name }}{{ v.value }}

{{ rep.description }}

Customer feedback

No customer reviews have been collected and reviewed for this snapshot, so sentiment and recurring themes have not been assessed.

Understanding result labels
{{ r.symbol }} {{ r.label }}

{{ r.meaning }}

{{ rep.footer }}
← Back to assessment

{{ rep.name }} · Evidence explorer

Individual checks

{{ rep.assessmentDate }}

Scoring method & component breakdown

PROVISIONAL SCORE · HIGHER IS BETTER

{{ rep.trustScore }}/ 100
{{ rep.trustRating }}

{{ rep.trustCaption }}

Provisional means the method and evidence are incomplete or awaiting validation. This is not a probability of safety. Missing evidence is excluded from scoring; it is not a demonstrated problem.

How is this calculated?

{{ m }}

BY RISK AREA · OUT OF 100

{{ a.name }}{{ a.score }}{{ a.context }}
What makes up each area

{{ a.name }} {{ a.score }} / 100

  • {{ c.source }} {{ c.name }} {{ c.score }} {{ c.detail }}

{{ rep.partsNote }}

Imported rating sources & dates
{{ x.name }}{{ x.date }}{{ x.url }}{{ x.url }}

No matching checks

Change the search, result or question to explore other checks.

{{ inspector.breadcrumb }}

{{ selectedCheck.symbol }} {{ selectedCheck.consumerStateLabel }}

{{ selectedCheck.name }}

{{ selectedCheck.plainMeaning }}

{{ selectedCheck.answerLabel }}

{{ selectedCheck.consumerSummary }}

What this means for you: {{ selectedCheck.meansForYou }}

{{ selectedCheck.levelLabel }}

Finding

{{ selectedCheck.value }}

{{ selectedCheck.consumerMeaning }}

{{ selectedCheck.explanation }}

{{ selectedCheck.observationLabel }}

Evidence & sources · {{ selectedCheck.evidenceCount }}

No source record is linked to this finding.

{{ e.url }}{{ e.url }}{{ e.meta }}

{{ e.excerpt }}

Scoped observations

These facts concern the subjects and dates shown. An unresolved company contribution does not combine them.

{{ f.label }} · {{ f.state }}

{{ f.value }}

{{ f.qualifier }}

{{ e.source_url }}

Technical result & scoring rule

{{ selectedCheck.meta }}

{{ selectedCheck.rawStateLabel }}

{{ selectedCheck.ruleText }}

{{ selectedCheck.technicalRuleData }}

Compare companies

See findings and research gaps side by side.

{{ cmpCountLabel }}

Scroll sideways to add and compare companies →

Assessment area / check

{{ diffHint }}

Select two companies to compare their findings.

Add another company to see differences.

{{ h.name }}

{{ h.industry }}Fictional demo

{{ h.overall }} {{ h.label }}

{{ h.coverage }}

{{ h.findings }}
{{ resultsLabel }}

No companies match. Try another name.
{{ row.label }}
{{ row.sub }}
{{ c.text }} {{ c.gap }} —
{{ row.label }} Differs
{{ c.text }} {{ c.pts }}

No differing check results. Turn off the filter to see all checks.

Coverage shows research completeness, not safety. Records may differ in scope and date; missing evidence does not establish a difference in risk. Scores are provisional; demo scores are illustrative.

Assessed outcome differences

{{ differenceNote }}

{{ d.name }}

{{ d.meaning }}

{{ c.text }} · View finding →

OUR ASSESSMENT PROCESS

How we assess companies

SignalGuard evaluates public information about companies against defined checks. Our reports show what we found, the sources behind each finding and the limits of the assessment.

See the assessment process

Five steps, from public sources to company reports.

The five steps—Gather, Assess, Review, Report and Explore—lead to a simplified view of the SignalGuard report.
01

PUBLIC SOURCES

We collect publicly available information.

Research draws on company websites, published policies and public records. Technical checks record observable details about a company’s online services.

Source links and captured material provide a record of what was found and when. Each finding applies to the company, product and scope researched.

For example, finding a privacy policy confirms it is published, not that the company follows it.
Source records with original material, captured date and scope, using the site’s evidence card layout.
02

DEFINED CRITERIA

We assess five areas using defined checks.

The checks cover customer experience, service reliability, business practices, compliance and cybersecurity. Each check addresses a specific question about the company.

Results reflect what the available evidence supports. They may indicate a favourable finding, a concern or information for context. Unresolved and unassessed checks remain visible.

A result applies to the question assessed, not every aspect of the company.
Five assessment areas lead to a focused example: a customer experience question, the Page loading experience check, and its definition, evidence, scope, result and limitations. No company findings are shown.
03

HUMAN REVIEW

We review AI-assisted findings.

AI assists with extracting and summarizing source material. AI-assisted findings require human review before inclusion in an approved release.

Reviewers compare findings with the original sources, consider their context and limitations, and accept, reject or request changes. Publication requires a separate approval.

An AI summary is not evidence on its own.
A light per-check review form with supporting evidence, outcome, reason, and Reject, Needs changes and Accept decisions. Publication approval is separate.
04

COMPANY REPORTS

We present the results and their evidence.

Each report brings together the assessment results, recorded concerns and supporting sources. You can see the findings for each area and where questions remain unresolved.

Any displayed score is a provisional summary of assessed findings. Evidence coverage is shown separately: it indicates how many applicable checks have an assessed result.

Higher coverage means more checks have been assessed, not that the company is more trustworthy.
The actual report structure: header, open-arc trust gauge, separate evidence coverage, Assessment, Concerns and Claims, five area cards and question accordions. No company records are shown.
05

READING THE FINDINGS

You can examine the findings in detail.

Open an assessment area, select an individual check and review its supporting evidence. The report explains what the result means and the limitations that affect its interpretation.

When comparing companies, consider the sources, assessment dates and evidence coverage alongside the results. Use the findings to inform your own decisions.

Explore the directory
An individual check opens the site’s evidence inspector with result meaning, caveats, recorded observation and original sources.

UNDERSTANDING THE LIMITS

What an assessment can tell you

Public information has limits.

Public sources cannot establish every aspect of a company’s internal operations or customer experience. Findings describe the scope and time assessed.

Unknown is unresolved.

An Unknown result is neither favourable nor a concern. Checks without collected evidence are shown as Not assessed.

Scores are provisional.

Scores summarize available findings and remain subject to validation. They are not certifications or guarantees of safety, reliability or future performance.

ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY

Explore the assessment framework

Review the individual checks, collection methods, draft scoring weights and limitations in the full framework.

View the full assessment framework 5 areas · 17 sub-buckets · 57 checks

Technical terms, everyday implications

{{ g.term }}
{{ g.meaning }} {{ g.limitation }}
{{ st.label }}
{{ st.value }}
Sub-bucket

The 17 sub-buckets combine existing Purple Pages sections with newly proposed ones, such as Web risk or Support responsiveness. Each check has one primary sub-bucket and may also inform others.

Check

One of 57 checks in the master inventory. A check shows a result for a company only when evidence has been collected; otherwise it is Not assessed. Demo profiles summarize assessed findings into a trust score.

How evidence is gathered

{{ r.label }}{{ r.count }} checks
{{ r.title }}

{{ r.body }}

AI-assisted findings keep their source links and an uncertainty note. They point to public evidence; they are not independent verification, and the AI summary never replaces the original source.

What a result can look like

{{ t.label }} {{ t.body }} {{ t.example }}

An Unknown result is unresolved. It does not count for or against the company. A check with no collected evidence is shown as Not assessed. A documented finding that a required disclosure is missing is assessed separately under the relevant check.

How checks will be weighted

{{ wVersion }}

{{ wIntro }}

TierWeightWhat it meansChecksExamples
{{ t.label }} {{ t.weight }} {{ t.meaning }} {{ t.count }} {{ t.examples }}
{{ r.title }}{{ r.count }}

{{ r.body }}

{{ r.example }}

How an area score will be calculated

  1. {{ st.title }} {{ st.body }}
    2.

When evidence is missing

{{ m.t }}

{{ m.b }}

{{ wNote }}

The five risk areas

Pick an area to see its sub-buckets and every check. Select a check for its definition, access notes and limitations.

{{ mCur.name }}

{{ mCur.weight }}

{{ mCur.q }}

{{ mCur.d }}

What good results suggest: {{ mCur.means }}

Method Result Weight

{{ f.name }}

Sub-bucket {{ f.countText }}

{{ f.desc }}

{{ f.noneText }}
Definition
{{ k.def }}
Reports
{{ k.unit }} · or Unknown when it can't be determined
Limitations
{{ k.caveat }}
Weight
{{ k.weightText }}
Concern when
{{ k.concernWhen }}
If not found
{{ k.absentText }}
Why this weight
{{ k.rationale }}
Access
{{ k.access }}
Sub-buckets
{{ k.subs }}

No checks in this area match the selected filters.

Limitations

{{ l.t }}

{{ l.b }}

Reading guide

How to read a report

Result states

{{ b.label }}{{ b.range }} {{ b.meaning }}

Reports show how many checks have evidence and what each one found. Numeric scores, where available, are provisional summaries of the assessed findings. Fictional demo scores use synthetic evidence. The proposed weights (Critical ×4 down to Low ×1) are described under How it works.

The five areas we check

{{ h.name }}
{{ h.qPlain }}
{{ h.d }}
{{ h.weight }}

Evidence and sources

Open any check to see its source, retrieval date, method (Script, AI-extracted or Hybrid), the rule applied and its limitations. AI-extracted results show whether a person has reviewed them.

No public result is not a clean bill of health. Unknown and not-assessed checks are listed so gaps stay visible.